Because this is college football, where nothing important happens in a straightforward or efficient manner, one of the more important announcements of the offseason was buried deep in a Friday news release. In fact, taking the words at face value, it wouldn’t be news at all that the College Football Playoff acknowledged that a working group briefed the 11 university presidents who sit on its management committee about 63 different possibilities for a new playoff format, including 6-, 8-, 10-, 12- and 16-team options.“First and foremost, the working group conveyed to the management committee that it continues to support and believe in the four-team playoff as it is currently constituted,” the release stated in a nugget that mentioned after plans for stadium capacity for this year’s playoff and the progress being made by the national championship host committee in Indianapolis. Of course, to anyone steeped in the history of this organization, soft-pedaling any statement on playoff expansion is complete hogwash. The fact it’s even being formally mentioned at all by CFP executive director Bill Hancock is all but an admission the battle is over. All that’s left is figuring out the details of how and when it’s going to happen. Hancock, if you’ll remember, insisted the BCS was here to stay and a four-team playoff wasn’t the answer for college football — right up until the moment the presidents who employ him decided they needed to do a playoff. When Hancock acknowledged a few years ago the CFP may look at moving the dates of the semifinals in years when they fell on New Year’s Eve, guess what? The dates changed shortly thereafter. And from the beginning of the CFP in 2014, Hancock has batted away any speculation about expansion – until now. While the CFP hasn’t explicitly committed to expanding – putting expansion talk at the end of a very long press release was a semi-clever bit of chicanery – it certainly feels like a consensus has been reached within the industry over the last couple years that the format needs to change. The reasons aren’t difficult to figure out. Television ratings for the Playoff have declined since its debut, with this year’s title game down 27 percent from the 2019 season despite having a pair of television powerhouses in Alabama and Ohio State. Another factor in eroding interest is the semifinals generally not being competitive games, which looks even worse because it’s the same handful of teams getting nearly all of those playoff bids. Meanwhile, the Playoff has become so dominant in building the narrative of the season that teams who don’t quite make it to the semifinals have seen less interest from fans in traveling for big bowl games and from top players to compete in them. Something has to change, and everyone knows that. But figuring out the best path forward is complicated. That’s what the CFP’s Friday release could have said if they wanted to be completely transparent about what’s happening.
All data is taken from the source:
Article Link:
#playoff #channel7news #cnnlatestnews #news #nytimes #cnn #newsnow
This article was gathered automatically by our news bot. We help YouTubers by driving traffic to them for free. The featured image in this article is the thumbnail of the embedded video.
